Some people are complaining of organized surveillance with no known warrant, and no authority usually will tell them why its happening. Some have been told "its homeland security"; "you’ve been red-lined"; "its the military". What’s odd is some criminals are part of the community surveillance, and use it for illicit drug operations including for being "look-out" person for security of each other, businesses, etc.. But the innocent citizens that are targeted by this system are somehow deemed undesirable, dissident, whistle-blower, etc.. A few police agencies have acknowledged this is happening including the use of psychotronic weapons being applied. It is not widely reported in the corporate controlled news. Government progaganda says mental illness or chimerical thinking is involved to cover-up. In May 2007, On CNN (news) , CIA even admitted using the remote weapons on a college student to harm mental and physical health. What is going on??? How has this happened in the USA with our Constitution and Bill of Rights??

Technorati Tags: bill of rights, cnn, cnn news, constitution, criminals, drug operations, google, homeland security, illicit drug, innocent citizens, mental illness, physical health, police agencies, psychotronic weapons, quot quot, script type, surveillance, text javascript, warrant, whistle blower

Seriously, I’ve seen NOTHING about this, yet in 2000 a joint CIA-Pentagon effort was agreed to locate Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan. So, long BEFORE 9/11 we used REMOTE operated weaponized military aircraft to hunt the person who a year later is responsible for using PEOPLE operating civilian aircraft as a weapon.
The first experimental flight was held on 7 September 2000, so a year and 4 days later, in response to our attempt to hunt down and kill Bin Laden, his followers crash 2 planes into the World Trade Center?
Sorry folks too much history channel, but the whole March 2k flight training & the Sept 7 2k Predator flights bug me. The tech was there, the reason to attack was there.
Totalitarianism is uses state-controlled mass media, a single party that controls the state, personality cults, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of free discussion and criticism, the use of mass surveillance, and widespread use of state terrorism.
What have we missed w/ Bush and Obama? Fox/CNN, What parties beside Rep/Dem (What is the real difference? Popular (Majority) vote ,means nothing.), Nobel Prize for ACTUALLY doing NOTHING!!!, ECONOMY?, Disagree with Bush terror-IST/Obama race-IST, Facial Rec software at DMV;Traffic Cam’s etc…, 9/11 counts if it was state sponsored; Timothy McVeigh only managed to restrict parking!
Maybe it’s too late at night and I’ve just been watching too much History Channel, but once the fact I’ve seen nothing about the possibility that the 9/11 planes were controlled like Predator Drones…
Help me out folks, make me feel like a citizen again, because I’ve never seen myself as a conspiracy nutter, and I don’t want to start now.
Well thanks for the reassurance folks! Looks like I have been watching too much of the Paranoia, Err, History Channel. It is an interesting thought though, as the Predator drones have been in combat use since 1995, and it really wouldn’t be impossible to merely override the flight controls to be remotely operated. Maybe I’ll start watching Animal Planet from now on. =D
Well thanks for the reassurance folks! Looks like I have been watching too much of the Paranoia, Err, History Channel. It is an interesting thought though, as the Predator drones have been in combat use since 1995, and it really wouldn’t be impossible to merely override the flight controls to be remotely operated. Maybe I’ll start watching Animal Planet from now on. =D

Technorati Tags: 7 september, civilian aircraft, cnn, experimental flight, flight training, google, history channel, majority vote, mass surveillance, nobel prize, nutter, obama, predator drones, script type, single party, sorry folks, state terrorism, timothy mcveigh, traffic cam, well thanks

Seriously, I’ve seen NOTHING about this, yet in 2000 a joint CIA-Pentagon effort was agreed to locate Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan. So, long BEFORE 9/11 we used REMOTE operated weaponized military aircraft to hunt the person who a year later is responsible for using PEOPLE operating civilian aircraft as a weapon.
The first experimental flight was held on 7 September 2000, so a year and 4 days later, in response to our attempt to hunt down and kill Bin Laden, his followers crash 2 planes into the World Trade Center?
Sorry folks too much history channel, but the whole March 2k flight training & the Sept 7 2k Predator flights bug me. The tech was there, the reason to attack was there.
Totalitarianism is uses state-controlled mass media, a single party that controls the state, personality cults, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of free discussion and criticism, the use of mass surveillance, and widespread use of state terrorism.
What have we missed w/ Bush and Obama? Fox/CNN, What parties beside Rep/Dem (What is the real difference? Popular (Majority) vote ,means nothing.), Nobel Prize for ACTUALLY doing NOTHING!!!, ECONOMY?, Disagree with Bush terror-IST/Obama race-IST, Facial Rec software at DMV;Traffic Cam’s etc…, 9/11 counts if it was state sponsored; Timothy McVeigh only managed to restrict parking!
Maybe it’s too late at night and I’ve just been watching too much History Channel, but once the fact I’ve seen nothing about the possibility that the 9/11 planes were controlled like Predator Drones…
Help me out folks, make me feel like a citizen again, because I’ve never seen myself as a conspiracy nutter, and I don’t want to start now.

Technorati Tags: 7 september, civilian aircraft, cnn, experimental flight, flight training, google, history channel, majority vote, mass surveillance, military aircraft, nobel prize, nutter, obama, predator drones, script type, single party, sorry folks, state terrorism, timothy mcveigh, traffic cam

FOXNews.com Rave Review Included In TV Ads for Michael Moore’s ‘Sicko’
Posted by Tim Graham on June 19, 2007 – 14:22.

Sometimes, it’s a little tough for the Fox News-bashing left to stamp the Ailes Network with the Uniformly Right-Wing complaint. For example, it’s not every day that Fox News looks liberal on CNN. But I caught the new commercial for leftist propagandist Michael Moore’s new mockumentary "Sicko" on CNN late this morning. One of three ecstatic reviewers in the TV ad is Roger Friedman of FOXNews.com ("Brilliant!")

Is that one of those tricky studio edits that doesn’t really represent the critic’s opinion? Um, no. Friedman’s online review was a rave. It began: "Filmmaker Michael Moore’s brilliant and uplifting new documentary, ‘Sicko,’ deals with the failings of the U.S. healthcare system, both real and perceived. But this time around, the controversial documentarian seems to be letting the subject matter do the talking, and in the process shows a new maturity."

Friedman added: "Unlike many of his previous films (‘Roger and Me,’ ‘Bowling for Columbine,’ ‘Fahrenheit 9-11′), ‘Sicko’ works because in this one there are no confrontations. Moore smartly lets very articulate average Americans tell their personal horror stories at the hands of insurance companies. The film never talks down or baits the audience." Friedman even agreed with Moore that the film was not partisan – but the commercial has two jokey cuts mocking President Bush, including the old gaffe that OB-GYNS can’t "practice their love with women" due to the liability problem. Mature? Nonpartisan?

Of course, film reviewing is about the art of film, and not just the politics, I haven’t seen the film so I can’t comment on its maturity or lack of confrontation. (The commercial does feature Moore lying to a security guard about whether his camera was on. Cheeky? Or too casual about lying?)

But Friedman also raved the last Moore film was "brilliant" at FOXNews.com: "It turns out to be a really brilliant piece of work, and a film that members of all political parties should see without fail. As much as some might try to marginalize this film as a screed against President George Bush, "F9/11" — as we saw last night — is a tribute to patriotism, to the American sense of duty — and at the same time a indictment of stupidity and avarice." He added it was a must-see: "But, really, in the end, not seeing ‘F9/11′ would be like allowing your First Amendment rights to be abrogated, no matter whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat."

So much for the cartoon image of Fox News as a land of Bush-loving automatons. The other rave reviewers in the commercial are Leah Rozen of People Magazine ("A massive home run!") and Jan Stuart of Newsday ("Wildly entertaining!")

UPDATE: Scott Whitlock e-mailed that Friedman had a similar rave for Al Gore’s "An Inconvenient Truth" — it’s featured on the cover of the DVD, he says. The quote: "It doesn’t matter whether you’re a Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative…your mind will be changed in a nanosecond."

Technorati Tags: bowling for columbine, cnn, confrontations, controversial documentarian, fahrenheit 9 11, filmmaker michael moore, fox news, gaffe, google, healthcare system, horror stories, liability problem, michael moore, mockumentary, personal horror, previous films, propagandist, script type, sicko, tim graham

The problem is that the Obama Administration’s Department of Home Land Security botched the vetting of the pre-flight passenger list.

(Let’s not discuss here the poor vetting of the Obama Cabinet members, unless you see it as pertinant.)

In an apparently apologetic spin in behalf of the Obama administration Fox News called Friday’s terrorist activity on a NW flight a “thwarted plot”.

A statement which would tend to make one believe that the Obama Administration had prior knowledge and acted upon that knowledge…which by White House press secretary Robert Gibbs’ admission they did not.

A less supportive CNN reported what amounted to an admission by White House press secretary Robert Gibbs that the administration had nothing to do with stopping the “a botched terror attack”.

Obviously the Obama administration knew nothing and did nothing to prevent the security breech.

The question that I have is:

Do Americans really need to be subjected to a higher level of pre-flight screening when the problem is that Home Land Security approved, for a foreign government prior to take off a flight with a known terrorist on board, the passenger flight list?

Terror Suspect Wasn’t Considered Threat
Sunday, December 27, 2009

Suspect Not a Threat?

Suspect in thwarted plot to blow up plane not considered a danger despite being in government databases

The alleged Christmas Day terrorist had been in one of the U.S. government’s largest terror databases since November, when his father brought him to the attention of embassy officials in Nigeria. But Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab came to the attention of intelligence officials months before that, according to a U.S. government official involved in the investigation.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,581211,00.htm, Sunday, December 27, 2009, 08:39:26 AM PST, FOX NEWS

Obama orders review of flight screenings
December 27, 2009 10:32 a.m. EST

(CNN) — President Obama has ordered a review of security screening processes after Friday’s botched terror attack on a U.S. airliner, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Sunday.

Appearing on the ABC program "This Week" and the NBC program "Meet the Press," Gibbs said Obama is receiving regular briefings by his national security staff on the incident in which a suspect allegedly tried to detonate an explosive device on a Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam, The Netherlands, making its final approach to Detroit, Michigan.

The suspect, 23-year-old Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was on a broad watch list of 550,000 names since last month, Gibbs said

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TRAVEL/12/27/airline.attack.security/index.html, Sunday, December 27, 2009, 08:42:37 AM PST, CNN News

Technorati Tags: cabinet members, christmas day, cnn, embassy officials, farouk, flight screening, fox news, google, government databases, intelligence officials, obama, passenger flight, passenger list, pertinant, robert gibbs, script type, secretary robert, security breech, terror attack, white house press